Reporting and analysis
I used an LLM to classify statements from nearly 600 high-profile right-wing accounts, podcasts and other media, finding more than 7,000 questioning the election's integrity this year, with noncitizen voting and mail-in ballot claims twice as prevalent as in 2024.
washingtonpost.com ↗
In the final week before the 2026 midterms, we wanted to try to quantify something we were all feeling: that Trump and his supporters are priming their base to doubt the results of the election in the event that the Republicans lose — something widely projected to occur in polls as Trump's popularity continues to suffer.
I used an LLM classifier to sort social media posts, podcast transcripts and other online statements from high-profile political influencers into election security-related topics, then combined that with Factbase data on Trump's in-person remarks, speeches and press conferences. The classifier had an accuracy rate of over 97 percent on a human-labeled test set of more than 200 statements.
That turned up more than 7,000 statements this year from nearly 600 right-wing accounts, podcasts and other outlets questioning the election's integrity. Claims that noncitizens are on voter rolls and that mail-in ballots enable widespread fraud were twice as prevalent as during the 2024 cycle, while mentions of voting machines and general election rigging — a staple of past elections — appears to have been supplanted by those immigrant-related narratives. Trump himself made nearly 300 such statements in his second term and mentioned voter ID and mail-in ballots more than six times more often in 2026 than in 2025.
I ran the same analysis for the left's pushback to these narratives. Statements opposing on these claims more than doubled compared with the 2024 cycle — an even faster increase than in right-wing election integrity claims.